These case studies are built from public-record leases, CAM statements, and CAMAudit pipeline outputs. They show exactly what your firm delivers to clients: specific findings, dollar amounts, and the lease provisions that ground each dispute.
A public-record CAM case study showing $5,952 in flagged insurance pass-through charges in a CVS pharmacy sublease inside Target.
Apparent overcharge
$5,952
Findings
2
High confidence
$5,952
A public-record office lease case study showing $76,440 in apparent overcharges tied to a deflated base year and a controllable expense cap miss.
Apparent overcharge
$76,440
Findings
2
High confidence
$76,440
A public-record municipal market case study showing $32,201.40 in apparent overcharges from doubtful accounts reserves and executive overhead allocations.
Apparent overcharge
$32,201
Findings
2
High confidence
$32,201
A public-record mixed-use lease case study showing $42,875 in apparent overcharges from lobby renovation soft costs and landlord overhead.
Apparent overcharge
$38,546
Findings
5
High confidence
$38,546
A public-record strip-center case study showing how a 4.50% statement share versus a 4.24% lease share produced a $2,340.15 apparent overcharge.
Apparent overcharge
$2,340
Findings
1
High confidence
$2,340
A public-record retail lease case study showing ~$18,746 in apparent overcharges from parking lot resurfacing and curb replacement billed through CAM.
Apparent overcharge
$18,746
Findings
2
High confidence
$18,746
A public-record government office case study where the pipeline surfaced a gross-up advisory on a $42,875 expense pool. The Rule 18 true-up finding from the prior pipeline run did not reproduce in the current multi-pass extraction.
Apparent overcharge
$0
Findings
0
High confidence
$0
A public-record CAM case study showing $4,400 in management fee overcharges: landlord billed 11.1% effective rate against a 5% contractual cap.
Apparent overcharge
$4,400
Findings
1
High confidence
$4,400
A public-record CAM case study showing $25,500 in management fee overcharges on a GSA lease: landlord billed $67,500 against a $42,875 absolute dollar cap.
Apparent overcharge
$25,500
Findings
1
High confidence
$25,500
A public-record office lease case study showing Rule 5 advisory findings on $135,600 in fixed tax and insurance costs that must not be grossed up.
Apparent overcharge
$0
Findings
2
High confidence
$0
A public-record office lease case study with Rule 5 advisory finding on $52,800 in property insurance that must not be included in gross-up calculations.
Apparent overcharge
$0
Findings
1
High confidence
$0
A public-record retail CAM case study showing $13,100 in CAM overcharges: landlord billed $127,500 against a $114,400 cap (4% over prior year $110,000).
Apparent overcharge
$13,100
Findings
1
High confidence
$13,100
A public-record retail CAM case study showing $11,250 in CAM overcharges: landlord billed $108,900 against a $97,650 cap (5% over prior year $93,000).
Apparent overcharge
$11,250
Findings
1
High confidence
$11,250
A public-record retail CAM case study showing $8,340 in CAM overcharges: landlord billed $82,500 against a $74,160 cap (3% over prior year $72,000).
Apparent overcharge
$8,340
Findings
1
High confidence
$8,340
A public-record office lease case study with Rule 10 advisory finding on a $148,600 property tax line item requiring cross-check against assessor records.
Apparent overcharge
$0
Findings
1
High confidence
$0
A public-record office lease case study showing Rule 10 advisory finding: $9,500 tax appeal fee billed with no corresponding refund credit despite a lease refund-back requirement.
Apparent overcharge
$0
Findings
1
High confidence
$0
A public-record retail CAM case study showing $25,700 in utility double-billing: electricity and gas billed in CAM despite tenant's direct-pay lease obligation.
Apparent overcharge
$25,700
Findings
2
High confidence
$25,700
A public-record retail CAM case study showing $16,400 in utility double-billing: electricity and HVAC billed in CAM despite direct-pay obligations verified via CPS Energy records.
Apparent overcharge
$16,400
Findings
2
High confidence
$16,400
A public-record office lease case study showing $28,500 in common area misclassification: dedicated server room HVAC pooled into shared CAM instead of billed directly.
Apparent overcharge
$28,500
Findings
1
High confidence
$28,500
A public-record retail CAM case study showing $10,700 in common area misclassification: dedicated electrical panel and plumbing upgrades pooled into shared CAM.
Apparent overcharge
$10,700
Findings
2
High confidence
$10,700
A public-record retail CAM case study showing $27,000 in pro-rata share overcharges: landlord applied 13.5% instead of the lease-specified 12.0%.
Apparent overcharge
$27,000
Findings
1
High confidence
$27,000
A public-record office lease case study showing $42,875 in pro-rata share overcharges: landlord applied 15.75% instead of the lease-specified 14.00%.
Apparent overcharge
$42,875
Findings
1
High confidence
$42,875
A public-record office lease case study showing $59,500 in base year overcharges: landlord billed full current-year operating costs without applying the 2018 base year deduction.
Apparent overcharge
$59,500
Findings
2
High confidence
$59,500
A public-record office lease case study showing $124,000 in base year overcharges: landlord billed full operating costs without applying the 2019 base year deduction.
Apparent overcharge
$124,000
Findings
2
High confidence
$124,000
A public-record retail CAM case study showing $84,400 in controllable expense cap overcharges: landlord billed $1,010,000 against a $925,600 cap (4% over prior year $890,000).
Apparent overcharge
$84,400
Findings
1
High confidence
$84,400
A public-record retail CAM case study showing $30,900 in insurance overcharges: D&O and umbrella premiums passed through despite lease restricting insurance to property and general liability.
Apparent overcharge
$30,900
Findings
2
High confidence
$30,900
A public-record retail CAM case study showing $3,076 in true-up overcharges: landlord billed $11,500 reconciliation true-up against a correct amount of $8,424.
Apparent overcharge
$3,076
Findings
1
High confidence
$3,076
CAMAudit applies the same CAM forensic detection rules used in these public-record case studies. Upload a client lease and reconciliation and receive findings in under 15 minutes, with white-label report delivery under your firm brand.
Apply for partner access