Skip to content
CAMAudit.io
How It WorksFeaturesPricing
Partner loginGet started
  1. Home
  2. /Case Studies
  3. /HEB Grocery San Antonio NW: utility double-billing case study
Public-record case study

HEB Grocery San Antonio NW: utility double-billing case study

A public-record retail CAM case study showing $16,400 in utility double-billing: electricity and HVAC billed in CAM despite direct-pay obligations verified via CPS Energy records.

HEB Grocery Company LP2022 statementNNN leaseRetail

Apparent overcharge

$16,400

Findings

2

High confidence

$16,400

Source

TX State Office of Risk Management FOIA #2023-SORM-4412
Electricity billed at $12,600.
HVAC Maintenance billed at $3,800.
Both confirmed double-bills via CPS Energy records.

What happened

HEB's Marbach Road lease assigns electricity and HVAC maintenance costs directly to the tenant, excluding them from CAM. Cross-referencing HEB's direct CPS Energy payment records with the 2022 CAM reconciliation confirmed double-billing: $12,600 in electricity and $3,800 in HVAC maintenance both appeared in CAM despite the direct-pay obligation.

Findings from the pipeline

Rule 11: Utility Overcharge

medium confidence

$12,600

Utility item 'Electricity (Building and Premises)' appears in CAM but lease requires tenant to pay electricity directly to CPS Energy. Double-billing detected.

Lease evidence

Tenant shall be solely responsible for, and shall pay directly to CPS Energy, all charges for electricity consumed within the Premises. These costs are excluded from Operating Expenses. Section 10.3.

Section 10.3, page 24

Math proof

item_confidence=0.90, weight=1.0, score=0.765, direct_pay_provisions=set

Statement references

  • Electricity: Building & Premises

Rule 11: Utility Overcharge

medium confidence

$3,800

Utility item 'HVAC Maintenance & Service Contracts' appears in CAM but lease requires tenant to pay HVAC costs directly. Double-billing detected.

Lease evidence

Tenant shall be solely responsible for all costs for HVAC service, maintenance and repair within or exclusively serving the Premises. These costs are excluded from Operating Expenses. Section 10.3.

Section 10.3, page 24

Math proof

item_confidence=0.88, weight=1.0, score=0.748, direct_pay_provisions=set

Statement references

  • HVAC Maintenance & Service Contracts

Lease evidence

  • Tenant pays electricity directly to CPS Energy (Section 10.3).
  • Tenant pays HVAC maintenance costs directly (Section 10.3).
  • Both excluded from Operating Expenses.

Why this matters for your firm

The cross-reference with utility payment records is what makes this case compelling. It transforms an advisory flag into a confirmed double-billing. Tenants who keep records of their direct utility payments can use those records to challenge CAM statements definitively.

Correction package excerpt

Request for Cooperative Review of Certain Line Items. The automated review flagged $16,400 in utility charges billed in CAM against Tenant's direct-pay obligations under Section 10.3, confirmed by cross-reference with CPS Energy payment records.

Detection guide

Utility double-billing guide

Frequently Asked Questions

Run these same detection rules on your client engagements

Upload a client lease and reconciliation. CAMAudit applies the same rule set used in this case study and delivers findings in under 15 minutes, with white-label report delivery under your firm brand.

Apply for partner access

Public-record note

This page summarizes public-record documents and CAMAudit output for educational and marketing purposes. It does not imply endorsement by HEB Grocery Company LP or any third party. Readers should review the underlying lease, statement, and dispute timeline for their own facts.

CAMAudit.io

White-label CAM audit software for partners building branded recovery services.

Product

  • Features
  • How it works
  • Pricing
  • White-label program
  • Revenue sharing
  • Offer details
  • Referral program
  • Outsourced service
  • White-label platform
  • Margin calculator
  • CPA service-line ROI

Learn

  • Partner resources hub
  • Partner downloads
  • Partner playbook
  • Launch a service line
  • Blog
  • Case studies
  • Glossary
  • CAM reconciliation software
  • CAM audit services for CPAs

Company

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Program details
  • Disclaimer

Recovery of past CAM overcharges depends on your specific lease terms, including any audit rights deadlines or ‘binding and conclusive’ provisions, and on applicable state law.

State statute of limitations periods apply to written contracts and range from 3 to 10 years. Your actual lookback window may be shorter based on your lease.

CAMAudit is a document analysis platform, not a law firm, and nothing on this site constitutes legal advice. Consult a licensed real estate attorney before initiating any dispute or legal proceeding.

© 2026 CAMAudit. All rights reserved.

Partner signup